Comment on Danger
ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 months agoI’m imagining obvious fire damage and a chalk outline of intern Redshirt in front of the machine…
Comment on Danger
ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 months agoI’m imagining obvious fire damage and a chalk outline of intern Redshirt in front of the machine…
thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 7 months ago
you know, i bet it’s literally missing its primary control surface
Bertuccio@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Genuinely wouldn’t be surprised if someone did try to use it, but also don’t see why anyone would think a little red tag would prevent such a person from trying anyway.
Revan343@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
The red tag isn’t to stop it, it’s to document the stupidity. Now when it goes to court/WCB, there’s documented proof that they tried to ensure even amoron would understand it’s not safe to use
thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 7 months ago
yeah, it’s likely for insurance or regulatory reasons.
insurance will find any reason possible to deny your claim. even if that is a failure to remove the keys from the ignition after the car burst into flames.
regulators shouldn’t allow slack. with any company in a regulatory situation they will to exactly as much as they’re allowed to get away with. give them an inch, they take a Mile. letting hazard tags slide based on judgement creates space for corruption and abuse. following procedures to the letter with strict documentation can help curtail that.