I don’t even know what the other guy said exactly, but based on context I agree with you.
This is naturalization of people who have been in the US for a long time already. So they’ve already got jobs, housing, and legitimate visas.
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 months ago
cisco87@programming.dev 3 months ago
Not sure how being worried about liberals liberalizing with no regard for anything is pushing hate, but ok
mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 months ago
You seem to have jumped to the conclusion that the fact that perfectly legal naturalization of people living, working, and being productive members of their community is somehow going to destroy America.
That seems like some unfounded hate you’re spreading.
silence7@slrpnk.net 3 months ago
Claiming that naturalization of people who already live in the US is “destroying societies” is absolutely pushing hate.
cisco87@programming.dev 3 months ago
One can have the idea that immigration is bad, or we need to think all the same?
silence7@slrpnk.net 3 months ago
That’s a very different claim from the one you started with: that the conversion of immigrants who have lived in the United States for 5+ years will somehow “destroy” society.
The latter is hate speech.
BurningRiver@beehaw.org 3 months ago
It’s great to destroy societies to win an election, is there enough housing, jobs, etc?
You start with a bad faith argument, and anyone is supposed to take you seriously?
tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 3 months ago
“Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”
silence7@slrpnk.net 3 months ago
It’s the standard language of malice. I’m not charitable when I see that
tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Let’s agree that they’re hateful and stupid then.
Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 3 months ago
First thought as I read your comment was por que no los dos?