Comment on JD Vance roasts Harris on Wisconsin tarmac for avoiding press, calls Air Force 2 his 'future plane'
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 3 months agoNo, the heritage foundation wrote it. Agenda 47 is very different from 2025.
Those are her prior policy stances.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months ago
…substack.com/…/project-2025-listed-authors-who-w…
She hasn’t changed her tune.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 3 months ago
I am not sure why you keep quoting 2025 as if it’s relevant to Trump. Also, 2025 has been shut down. So find a new boogey man to chase.
Well, according to her, she has. Now you see the issue, she keeps changing her opinion but won’t talk about it.
The debate is going to be epic as she watches her numbers drop when people realize how unqualified she is.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 months ago
It wasn’t shut down, it’s a playbook for the next decade of republican policies if they’re ever back in power. You can’t just shut down an agenda and not expect people won’t follow it.
forbes.com/…/project-2025-explained-what-to-know-…
This is a paradox. Please provide proof for this to be believable at ALLLL.
I cannot WAIT for the debate. A prosecutor vs a felon, it’s going to be amazing.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Incorrect. The Heritage Foundation is not part of the Republican Party. They are think tank group. They do not speak for the Republican party or for Trump.
Same here, she loses every debate as she is awful at it. It’s why she was never picked due to policies and her inability to have a debate.