Comment

Comment on Huw Edwards pleads guilty to making indecent images of children

According to the article he was sent the images by another man, he repeatedly asked the man not to send underage images, and he didn’t keep the images or forward them. He was charged with making indecent images of children and pleaded guilty. Does this mean that anyone who is sent such images can be legally guilty of this, even if they don’t request or want the images and delete them right away? Could malicious parties use this to get anyone they choose into trouble by sending them images? Or are there other considerations that go into making such a charge?

source

Sort:hotnew top

TedZanzibar@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

According to the Crown Prosecution Service, making indecent images can have a wide definition in the law and can include receiving them via social media.

Edwards’s barrister Philip Evans KC told the court: “There’s no suggestion in this case that Mr Edwards has… in the traditional sense of the word, created any image of any sort.”

I suppose the facts that he a) retained some of the images, b) didn’t report having received them and c) continued talking to the man has some bearing on his charges.

source
hellothere@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Yes, and yes.

It’s a very silly aspect of the law, which made sense before digital distribution (e.g making photocopies) but needs amending now.

source
wtfrank@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Has anyone heard what’s happened to the guy who sent the images? This presumably is the greater crime but there has been silence in the coverage I’ve seen

source
Madison420@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
That’s nice and all but did he report it to the police? CP is mandatory report by iirc every person in the eu and UK itself.

source