Comment on Before times.

daddy32@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• motor_spirit@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  monsanto iirc

  source
• fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Jesus, duh.

  source

  • ZarkleFarkle@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Or an Orb probably, which is a type of advanced conceptual computers Wizards believe in that can build up concepts step by step using internal multidimensional layers of overlapping strings.

    www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/circle-theorems.html

    source
• LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I posted this as a reply to another comment from a user on another instance, but your instance doesn’t allow you to see hexbear, so I’ll reply here too.

  Yeah, it’s a bit unfortunate using the word design that way. However, it’s not completely wrong, it’s almost more a problem of the baggage that the word design carries, obviously “intelligent design” as a concept for evolution is bullshit and if you can’t separate the concept of “design” from intent then you’re still just as wrong. All that said, I think it’s fair to talk about species being designed, there is just absolutely zero intent involved anywhere,* with no forethought, or any “thought” at all from the designer. A species is “designed” entirely by the forces of circumstance. The material conditions, if you will, of their environment.

  source