If the drones are flying over private property without explicit authorization, the FAA may be a good place to start.
Comment on US senators claim car makers sold driver data for pennies
memfree@beehaw.org 3 months agoI knew about the police getting access, but I missed that home insurance companies were checking properties with drones. I guess I don’t mind them spending their own money to send their own drones to verify properties they insure, but I agree that using MY camera that I bought to get info or sell MY data is at least unethical and ought to be illegal. It should be required that they get my explicit consent to that sort of thing for each instance of data collection or sale.
nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
averyminya@beehaw.org 3 months ago
I was under the impression that airspace is not part of land property, so flying drones above private property in most instances is not illegal. Could totally be wrong here
nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
In the US, property owners do indeed have some degree of rights over low-altitude airspace. The FAA states that one should have permission before intentionally flying over private property. In addition, a large number of states and municipalities have drone-specific surveillance, harassment, and privacy laws, so, it’s a fair change that those may apply. Any commercial drone operator that violates local laws in course of their flight is likely to run into trouble with the FAA too.
Truck_kun@beehaw.org 3 months ago
If you search for “home owner insurance non-renewal drone”, you should find tons of stories about it.
They may be hiring third parties, or doing it themselves, but regardless, it is happening.
Once again, to clarify, the smart camera thing has just been sitting in the back of my mind, not an accusation, just a concern as a possibility. Would probably be a fun investigation for an investigative journalist. Or just someone scouring those fun terms of service policies for language that might indicate such things.