Yeah someone is making crap up. “Hate” speech is still protected under the 1st amendment. Now she is a student which has more restrictions but the term all lives matter is a nice gesture since she’s seven.
The parents will win if they go to court.
Comment on Girl, 7, 'Too Young' for First Amendment Rights, Punished for 'Racist' BLM Drawing
Kaboom@reddthat.com 5 months ago“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Seems pretty straight forward to me.
Yeah someone is making crap up. “Hate” speech is still protected under the 1st amendment. Now she is a student which has more restrictions but the term all lives matter is a nice gesture since she’s seven.
The parents will win if they go to court.
Hate speech is very much not protected under the 1st amendment:
Even your linked articlevsays it is. You just cant make specific and clear threats that you have the ability to follow through on.
Correct.
What the kid said won’t pass the sniff test in court. It’s overly restrictive on political ideology.
Then you weren’t reading clearly. Here’s another source directly from the US Courts:
If you still can’t figure it out from this, then there’s just no getting through to you at all. That’s nobody’s problem but your own.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 5 months ago
Then you misunderstand, because years of legal precedent disagree lol.