NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Has anyone mentioned the word “union” in these communications yet? It needs to be gotten across that without a formal union, your bosses can just crush your little organisation with very few realistic legal consequences. They can make up bullshit reasons to fire you or reduce your hours as punishment. What is happening is just collective bargaining but without the legal protection of being a union.
Unions rarely strike. The threat of Industrial action (which is not just limited to striking) is usually an effective enough bargaining chip that in most cases, bosses offer concessions in negotiations without needing to resort to it.
There are limited forms of Industrial action as well. For example, the union can say that everyone should refuse overtime or that they should reduce their work to only the bare minimum required of them (which is called “work-to-order” or “work-to-rule”). Other tactics involve a large number of employees calling in sick on the same day. All of these allow workers to show their power without needing to sacrifice their paycheque.
If you contact the local chapter of a larger union organisation, they can provide resources to help organise your workplace. Google Search “Chicago restaurant workers union” and find the one that matches you and your colleagues’ values most, then reach out for help organising.
Employer intimidation is forbidden during the process of formally organising a union and will be prosecuted by the National Labour Relations Board.
noxy@yiffit.net 3 months ago
This is false. Per the NLRB:
A union can be as little as two workers who team up to improve their working conditions. Having a Union CONTRACT can be a thing, but it’s not required for legal protection, which can actually have some teeth if the bosses slip up in their union busting