Comment

US is almost like 50 different countries in one.

While this is obviously true, it's important to note that the US certainly isn't unique in this regard. Non-Americans often underestimate how diverse the US is. Americans often underestimate how diverse even seemingly homogenous European countries are, especially when diversity isn't immediately visible.

source

Sort:hotnew top

kava@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Of course variance in terms of culture, demographics, and industry in even small countries can be massive. My home city in Southern Brazil of almost 1 milliom population has less than 1% black population. Last time I visited for 2 weeks I didn’t see a single black person. This surprises some people because of the perception of Brazil and the fact they imported more slaves than any other country in the America’s.

So yes, I’m not claiming US is uniquely diverse. It’s just unusually large so it has large amounts of diversity due to geographic distance and total population + historic & current immigration.

However what I was trying to say by 50 different countries is that the laws can vary wildly from state to state. It is something that isn’t common in other countries. Of course there are other counties with strong federated systems where the provincial-level governments have strong autonomy (Germany and Switzerland come to mind) I think these types of countries are uncommon.

For example in Brazil no state regulates specific substances. That’s a power for the federal government. So if you buy a substance that’s legal in one state, you can safely bring it anywhere in Brazil. However in US this is not the case. I have the example of kratom, but Marijuana is another one.

This is what I was trying to say by 50 different countries. They aren’t actually countries but in some ways they have just as much if not more autonomy than countries, besides of course foreign policy decisions. But look at California for example. It’s economy is bigger than most countries in the world.

source
- Hyperreality@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Off the top of my head:
  
  Belgium (different languages, laws, educational systems, public broadcasters per language region, taxation, etc.)
  
  UK (different laws in Scotland, different laws in Northern Ireland, education policy, etc.)
  
  Spain (autonomous regions with their own languages, seperate civil law in Catalunya, Fueros + tax collection in the Basque country, etc.)
  
  China (the unofficial city tier system, Xinjiang, Tibet, etc.)
  
  Russia (autonomous regions in the far east, Kadyrov/Chechnya: strict alcohol prohibition and possibly years in jail, etc.)
  
  India (IRC autonomous administrative divisions can make their own laws, tribe/caste based laws/tribunals, Jammu and Kashmir which until quite recently had its own seperate consitution and for example Indians from other regions weren't allowed to buy land or property there.)
  
  source
  - Pipoca@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    According to etymonline, Yankee has been used to refer to different sets of Americans by different people for hundreds of years.
    
    1683, a name applied disparagingly by Dutch settlers in New Amsterdam (New York) to English colonists in neighboring Connecticut. … In English a term of contempt (1750s) before its use as a general term for “native of New England” (1765); during the American Revolution it became a disparaging British word for all American natives or inhabitants. Contrasted with southerner by 1828. Shortened form Yank in reference to “an American” first recorded 1778.
    
    The British calling someone from Texas a Yankee isn’t really any more right or wrong than someone from Texas calling someone from Pennsylvania a Yankee. Words can have contextual meanings.
    
    source