Comment on Neil deGrasse Tyson reads his peer review of Terrence Howard's mathematics theories

• danc4498@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  There’s a wide range of reactions that are not douchey while being both honest and on topic.

  source

  • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Cool. Give us one for Terry here.

    source

    • danc4498@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Rather than giving an entire unsolicited peer review, I would just mention there were issues with the paper and offer a full peer review if he’s interested. It’s clear from the paper that Terence has no idea what the process of a peer review is, so maybe start by educating him on that.

      Now, if that happened, or if Terrence sent the paper and asked for a full peer review, I would take back my comment. But based on this video, it didn’t feel like that’s what happened.

      source

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Talking about it hypothetically is a cop out.

        It’s clear from the paper that Terence has no idea what the process of a peer review is, so maybe start by educating him on that.

        By assuming he doesn’t know what peer review is (something anyone can google) you have guaranteed that someone will find your response douchey. By not giving a peer review you have also been dismissive.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Cool, give us one for Terry here.

    source