Comment on Hunter Biden laptop re-emerges as media embarrassment as it becomes key evidence at gun trial

• BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Then why ask for sources showing his wrong doing and dispute those sources?

  A couple reasons:

  • To understand your point better (you’re welcome)
  • To educate myself in case I missed something
  • I haven’t once dismissed away anything you’ve provided evidence for, I’m simply asking you why you give enough of a shit to follow Hunter at all and discuss him on a Political community. I have the same question for OP.

  Interesting though how every time I bring up that last point you can’t help but deflect. Calling it now. Your next comment will be a deflection and you won’t just directly answer me. But there ya go, I just directly answered you, so now it’s your turn.

  source

  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I haven’t once dismissed away anything you’ve provided evidence for

    Also you

    Hahahaha that article doesn’t have proof of shit.

    There’s no reason to lie about things.

    I’m simply asking you why you give enough of a shit to follow Hunter at all and discuss him on a Political community

    There was an impeachment inquiry into Joe based in part by the content of Hunter’s laptop. Instead of choosing to be ignorant on the matter I followed the proceedings. I responded because I knew my 100% factual statement correcting the liberal narrative would rile up you and your comrades.

    source

    • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I didn’t dismiss your article, I said it had no proof of anything, which it didn’t. You needed to supplement that article with additional evidence to confirm it was accurate, then I stopped mentioning it, didn’t I?

      I know our threads can be hard to follow sometimes but that’s because you keep deflecting and forgetting the topic.

      There was an impeachment inquiry into Joe based in part by the content of Hunter’s laptop.

      Yes, because the House can do that. 7 months into this inquiry and nothing has happened because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing.

      Since we’re keeping score, TFG had 3 impeachment inquiries, and articles of impeachment.

      Instead of choosing to be ignorant on the matter I followed the proceedings.

      So you’re aware proceedings are still going on because they haven’t been able to find any wrongdoing, yeah?

      I responded because I knew my 100% factual statement correcting the liberal narrative would rile up you and your comrades.

      Who’s riled? I’m simply asking for evidence that neither you nor the house have been able to find for 7 months now. I think you’re the riled one, posturing about it like it matters in the face of 7 months of dead ends.

      Honestly I’m not even mad. It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none.

      source

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I didn’t dismiss your article, I said it had no proof of anything, which it didn’t. You needed to supplement that article with additional evidence to confirm it was accurate, then I stopped mentioning it, didn’t I?

        It did, they had emails from Hunters laptop. You weren’t one of those idiots that believed it was a Russian hoax were you? It has been know for quite some time that the emails were authentic.

        I know our threads can be hard to follow sometimes but that’s because you keep deflecting and forgetting the topic.

        It’s more you bounce to new things after you’re proved wrong.

        Yes, because the House can do that. 7 months into this inquiry and nothing has happened because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing.

        *No evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

        Further don’t speak on this event like you’re an expert you were totally unaware of the details.

        So you’re aware proceedings are still going on because they haven’t been able to find any wrongdoing, yeah?

        Rember my 1st post when I said Joe hasn’t been implicated… That hasn’t changed with the fact you just learned.

        Who’s riled? I’m simply asking for evidence that neither you nor the house have been able to find for 7 months now. I think you’re the riled one, posturing about it like it matters in the face of 7 months of dead ends.

        It looks like you forgot or are lieing again (my money is on the latter), I never claimed there was evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

        Honestly I’m not even mad. It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry. Otherwise you already would’ve. You’re just deep into the sunk cost fallacy rn and flailing.

        Please show me where I said there’s evidence of wrong doing by Joe? I guess this is what you’re weasling to now, it’s kind of pathetic that you have to make things up.

        source

        • -> View More Comments