Comment on AI trained on photos from kids’ entire childhood without their consent
remotelove@lemmy.ca 5 months agoIt’s been around for a while. It’s the fluff and the parlor tricks that need to die. AI has never been magic and it’s still a long way off before it’s actually intelligent.
frog@beehaw.org 5 months ago
The other thing that needs to die is hoovering up all data to train AIs without the consent and compensation to the owners of the data.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
Cory Doctorow actually wrote a good article about this.
frog@beehaw.org 5 months ago
I remember reading that a little while back. I definitely agree that the solution isn’t extending copyright, but extending labour laws on a sector-wide basis. Because this is the ultimate problem with AI: the economic benefits are only going to a small handful, while everybody else loses out because of increased financial and employment insecurity.
So the question that comes to mind is exactly how, on a practical level, it would work to make sure that when a company scrapes data, trains and AI, and then makes billions of dollars, the thousands or millions of people who created the data all get a cut after the fact. Because particularly in the creative sector, a lot of people are freelancers who don’t have a specific employer they can go after. From a purely practical perspective, paying artists before the data is used makes sure all those freelancers get paid. Waiting until the company makes a profit, taxing it out of them, and then distributing it to artists doesn’t seem practical to me.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
The point is that It’s not an activity you can force someone to pay for.