Comment on Hunter Biden laptop re-emerges as media embarrassment as it becomes key evidence at gun trial

• jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  HAHAHAHA you still don’t get it.

  None of what you provided, even Hunter’s transcripts, implicates Joe in anything. You have yet to directly address this, meaning there’s nothing for me to respond to.

  Your back to this lie, I never claimed Joe was implicated by the emails. In my very first response I said there was no evidence that he was involved. I have no idea what mental defect you posses that causes you to be unable to understand this.

  Once again, Hunter is not relevant to anything political or conservative in any way, so there’s no point in saying anymore on him.

  If that’s true then why do you keep responding? Why were you so triggered by me saying hunters emails had more than drug and dick picks?

  source

  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I never claimed Joe was implicated by the emails

    This you?

    “Yes the laptop does not contain communication between Hunter and Joe discussing corrupt deals. It does contain details of Hunter making corrupt deals that Hunter claims Joe was party to.”

    I’m not asking you to prove this, I’m asking what the point is of even giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit.

    Once again, you complain about my reading comprehension but seem to lack your own.

    Gaslight

    Obstruct

    Project <- You are Here.

    If that’s true then why do you keep responding?

    Because I’m not going to let you shy away from a conversation that easily. You refuse to directly provide any kind of support as to why we should care about this at all, or why you believe there are “good” white supremacists to bring up that thread again, and your M.O. seems to just be to insult the other person and hyperfixate on the wrong aspect of a discussion while simultaneously being pretty fuckin rude to anyone that doesn’t give you a pass.

    I simply refuse to disengage because your behavior is not conducive to good faith discussion. You are free to at any time if you’re so bothered by that.

    source

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This you?

      “Yes the laptop does not contain communication between Hunter and Joe discussing corrupt deals. It does contain details of Hunter making corrupt deals that Hunter claims Joe was party to.”

      Are you agreeing that I never claimed that Joe was implicated by the emails? I just want to make sure you’re not confused again.

      I’m not asking you to prove this, I’m asking what the point is of even giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit.

      I’ll answer your question with a question. Why are you giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit?

      why you believe there are “good” white supremacists

      That is an outright lie I never made that claim. You had ample opportunities to provide the quote but you never did.

      your M.O. seems to just be to insult the other person and hyperfixate on the wrong aspect of a discussion while simultaneously being pretty fuckin rude to anyone that doesn’t give you a pass.

      Did you ever think it might be because you make false claims about me that I’m rude to you?

      source

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Your grand response is “no you answer your questions first”??? HAHAHAHA

        ok you clearly don’t actually have any desire to discuss this.

        source

        • -> View More Comments