They can survive by paying living wages. They just don’t want to.
Comment on The fast-food industry claims the California minimum wage law is costing jobs. Its numbers are fake
brygphilomena@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
If your business cannot survive paying living wages then your business does not deserve to survive.
Your business is not more important than the employees, despite whatever they try to say.
Delusional@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
brygphilomena@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Oh, I know they won’t close. That’s just their threat. They keep saying “oh woe is us, if we have to pay living wages then we won’t be able to keep the staff hours or we’ll go out of business and look at all the employees that would lose their jobs.”
But it’s a thinly veiled threat and always has been.
If your business closes because you can’t manage your costs, then another business will fill the void that can. Isn’t that how they always describe capitalism and the “free” market? They have money to pay for all this media and “reporters” to repeat their propaganda. They’d rather pay that then spend the same on their employees.
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
+1. A lot of pushback I’ve seen is along the lines of “but all these business owners will have to close their businesses!”. What short sighted BS. We are talking about decades and decades of wage stagnation and business models that are not teneble with living wages. We are talking about a history of having the public subsidize the profits of these businesses through social programs for their workers, while the money stolen from labor goes right into the pockets of the owner.
Will some, or even many, businesses need to close? Yes. Should they have to? Yes. We collectively need to get out of this mindset that MBA-think is the way. It is not.