Comment

Comment on Hunter Biden laptop re-emerges as media embarrassment as it becomes key evidence at gun trial

Your reading comprehension is terrible, I’m guessing 5th or 6th grade level. I never made the claim the emails on Hunter’s laptop proved Joe was party to the corrupt deals. Litterly the 1st sentence of my original post acknowledges so.

Yes the laptop does not contain communication between Hunter and Joe discussing corrupt deals.

source

Sort:hotnew top

BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Maybe you and your reading comprehension. That comment was a response to your last comment, which contained an article link which did make that argument.

Next time you try to provide a source make sure you understand what it says, and call out the relevant parts lol.

source
- jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Expecting you to understand that big long article was my fault I’ll move a little slower so you don’t get confused.
  
  What exactly in my original statement are you disputing? When you provide this I will copy the text that supports my statement for you so you don’t have to read that big scary article.
  
  source
  - BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Oh I’ve provided that already. Your original comparison doesn’t work until you show how the tell things are like-for-like.
    
    Have you forgotten already?
    
    source
    jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    
    Your original comment doesn’t work until you can provide proof that “evidence” came off of Hunter’s laptop.
    
    Is Hunter Biden authenticating the email evidence enough? Here’s a part of the transcript of his testimony.
    
    Exhibit 16 is a subject,8 Expectations. It’s from James Gilliar to Tony Bobulinski. Rob Walker and yourself.9 Have you seen this email before?10 A I have. I’ve seen it, I think, as we all have, 8,642,300 times.11 Q Okay. And you’d expected we’d ask you about it here today, correct?12 A Of course, I did, yeah.13 Q Okay.14 A Yeah.15 Q At the bottom, so I’ll skip reading the whole email if I may. And at the16 bottom, it says, "At the moment, there’s provisional agreement that the equity will be17 distributed as follows.18 A Uh-huh.19 Q “20 to H,” which presumably is yourself. Is that correct?20 A Yes.21 Q “20, RW,” that’s Rob Walker, correct?22 A Yes.23 Q “20, James Gilliar.” Is that correct?24 A Yes.
    
    If you’re trying to implicate Joe you need to provide evidence of that, which you’ve failed to do.
    
    Your 5th grade reading comprehension strikes again at no point have I claimed the emails on Hunters laptop implicate Joe.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments