Comment on [deleted]
darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 5 months ago
Anti-AI is a brain-dead idea anyway. Artists should be more open with their art, not less. Yes, even with AI.
Comment on [deleted]
darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 5 months ago
Anti-AI is a brain-dead idea anyway. Artists should be more open with their art, not less. Yes, even with AI.
Vodulas@beehaw.org 5 months ago
Are you saying artists should be OK with AI companies stealing their art an using it without permission?
darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 5 months ago
Well, if you don’t copyright everything, then it’s not stealing. We need more open culture, not closed off “IP”.
Vodulas@beehaw.org 5 months ago
The issue there is that we still live in a capitalist hellscape, and artists need to make money to survive. Until we have a situation where artists can make art and not worry about where their rent (yes, fuck landlords) or food, they will need to be able to make a living somehow.
onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 months ago
On principal I agree, but have you thought about how artists are to make a living? It is already hard now, so how should they make money in the future?
Anti Commercial-AI license
darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 5 months ago
The same way they are now? Copyright is barely a protection for independent artists, and largely serves the interests of big “IP” holders like Disney.
Paragone@beehaw.org 5 months ago
You don’t have to do ANYthing in order to have copyright on your images.
That is standard throughout the Berne convention & has been for decades.
Registering makes court-cases easier to win, but having copyright on one’s renditions isn’t in any way requiring that one have registered anything with anybody.
darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 5 months ago
Ok, but that is beside the point. Copyright only serves the interests of large IP holders, like Disney.