“With this in mind, it should be clear that a candle flame gives off light even though it is not a plasma. In contrast to candle flames, certain burning mixtures of acetylene can reach 3,100 degrees Celsius, with an associated Debye length of 0.01 millimeters, according to the Coalition for Plasma Science. Such flames are therefore plasmas (as long as the flame is much larger than 0.01 millimeters, which is usually the case). Other flames, including flames from campfires, propane stoves, and cigarette lighters, have temperatures that lie somewhere between these two extremes, and therefore may or may not be plasma.”
Comment on Ok sir
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Just in case anyone actually wants to know: fire is not plasma, which is ionised (electrons not bound to the nucleus) matter, but simply smoke particles hot enough to glow.
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 months ago
papalonian@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I somehow never knew what “fire” was until reading this comment. Huh.
Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 months ago
Fire is much more complex than that. Fires appearance comes from:
Fire is an active chemical reaction. It’s a transition between often solid or liquid, sometimes gaseous, fuels, into gaseous products, all while undergoing a chemical reaction. It’s not a state of matter, states of matter concern the phase of equilibrium conditions, and fire is decidedly not in equilibrium.
original_reader@lemm.ee 4 months ago
This needs an ELI5 version…
Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 months ago
Hot things glow, some chemical reactions glow, fire does both, mostly the latter especially for cooler fires.
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Thanks for the correction! My first part was still forest though - fire is not plasma.