Comment on How come no true use for recent AI developments has been found yet?
BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 4 weeks agoThat’s not a secret. The industry constantly talks about the difference between LLMs and AGI.
Comment on How come no true use for recent AI developments has been found yet?
BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 4 weeks agoThat’s not a secret. The industry constantly talks about the difference between LLMs and AGI.
slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Until a product goes through marketing and they slap that ‘Using AI’ into the blurb when it doesn’t.
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
LLMs are AI. They are not AGI. AGI is a particular subset of AI, that does not preclude non-general AI from being AI.
People keep talking about how it just regurgitates information, and says incorrect things sometimes, and hallucinates or misinterprets things, as if humans do not also do those things. Most people just regurgitate information they found online, true or false. People frequently hallucinate things they think are true and stubbornly refuse to change when called out. Many people cannot understand when and why they’re wrong.
0x30507DE@lemmy.today 4 weeks ago
People can also stop saying words and think for a second about the information they’re actually saying first, whereas an LLM just vomits up words that seem to match the pattern of the rest of the sentence. If I were to ask you what 2 + 2 is, you’d stop, run the math in your head, get 4, then reply with 4. An LLM would just start vomiting out words based on what it’s been trained on without verifying that the information is good (or even relevant), and can end up confidently telling you that 2 + 2 is in fact equal to the cube root of 5 because that’s what the data said so it has to be right, for instance.
I’m aware this is a drastic oversimplification, and I think the tech is neat (although I avoid non-self-hosted models like the plague due to privacy concerns), but it’s oversold to all hell, and is definitely not even close to intelligent.
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
You haven’t really looked into multi-agent setups at all, have you? Basically any system of multiple agents can double-check themselves.
Additionally, none of this conflicts with my original point. If you train a human on bad data, they’ll GIGO too. I know plenty of humans who have confidently told me objectively false things because they had bad training data.