Comment on Why Biden's New Bill Is So Terrifying - Second Thought
mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 year ago
This video would all make perfect sense except for the big inclusion of the smiling face of the only US president to put sanctions on Israeli settlers, freeze military aid to Israel, or other weird little weak-sauce attempts to reign in our favorite partner for war crimes out of a whole world of war crime adjacent ally countries. And the assignation of blame to him for the "antisemitism" bill which as far as I know has nothing in particular to do with him.
Is that enough? Fuck no. Does it excuse Biden's support for their crimes including providing literally the bombs that are being used to blow up women and little children and hospitals? Fuck no.
Is it worth digging into why this channel which is supposedly so passionate about advancing left wing causes in the United States, has as its only two videos that I'm familiar with, two very Biden-specific videos (this one and a "why voting is a bad idea if you are a left wing person" video) the logic of which doesn't make a whole lot of sense if you take it at face value, but makes perfect sense if you're trying to come out with a big slick professionally produced video about why left wing people should not try to stop Trump from coming to power? With no particular other solutions to offer, other than making sure Biden doesn't get elected?
Fuck fuck fuckity fuck fuck yes.
Cablerumor@discuss.online 1 year ago
As president he has the ability to restrict arms deals, veto this bill and voice dissent, has said that Palestinian protestors are antisemitic and lawless, has changed his redline so Israel could do more genocide while saving face, has doctored evidence to prove no genocide is occurring, has a cabinet (assigned not elected) voicing unwavering support to Israel, has circumvented congress for arms deals, has voiced support towards police violently breaking up peaceful encampments, has personally relayed fabricated propaganda (40 decapitated babies) to the american public and recanting it privately. You’re asking why the ‘leader of the free world’ is being criticized by communist? Because he’s actively complicit in a genocide and is directly pressured by an upcoming election to change course or inevitably lose. Everyone should be disgusted by biden and working overtime to ensure focus groups begin to show that Israeli support will demolish his chances of getting into office. Otherwise this will continue and quite honestly I don’t believe any of you really cared for this to change.
mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 year ago
Dude I'm not saying Biden is good on Israel. He's enabling genocide. If it sounded like I was saying he's doing a good job, I am not.
I am saying it's weird that a video that is super concerned about the plight of the Palestinian people is singularly focused on the one type of action -- finding things that you can look at sideways in such a way that it'll depress support for him in the general election -- that is almost guaranteed to make things worse for them, worse for student protestors, and worse for a whole bunch of other people.
It's like someone in the middle of World War 2 who's very very concerned for the plight of oppressed people who is suddenly very very vocal about the fact that Churchill is a racist warmongering dickface. Like yes... he is. Why are you saying that and what is your alternative you're pushing? If it is "let's do uncommitted votes, let's do a protest, let's divest from Israel, let's resign from the State Department, let's do these things that will put pressure on Biden now and generally hopefully help the Palestinians," then fuckin-a let's rock and roll, we can be friends. If it is "let's let Trump come to power because I'm mad that Biden is continuing American empire and all its crimes instead of ending it," I'm gonna have some questions about your motivation in saying that.
Surely that makes sense? Or no?
Cablerumor@discuss.online 1 year ago
We have no obligation to coddle or avoid acknowledging the complicity of a sitting president in a genocide. Biden expressed full support for this bill if it passes. Getting angry at communists for calling out the one person who can flip the situation overnight is ridiculous.
Surely that makes sense?
mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 year ago
Was "He's enabling genocide" somehow not clear enough for you to understand that I agree with you on this? Feels like you're just assigning some kind of strawman view to me so you can have your little grandstanding, and avoid dealing with the totally different things that my message was actually saying. Which, I mean, sure, carry on if that's what you want to do, but regardless of that nothing in this is anything that I was doing or anything that I disagree with.
Citation needed (not saying you're wrong, I just haven't seen it; I'm just curious)
Citation needed
(Also, totally separate topic, while I was reading up to write this message: You will never guess why it is that MTG and Matt Gaetz had objections to the bill. I'm serious -- it would have taken me quite a few guesses before I arrived at why it is that they're angry about it.)
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I haven’t watched the video, but I want to address your rhetoric, because it has several issues.
What you are engaging in is a form of projection.
No one is obligated to give you a solution to a problem, or does their identification of a problem imply they have some kind of ulterior motive. You are projecting what you wish their motivation was onto them, and then attacking them what you imagine their motivation to be.
Saying that Joe Biden’s electoral chances are weak and he has little chance of getting elected doesn’t mean I support Trump. Before we can have a conversation about alternatives, we need to be honest with ourselves about what the facts are. Being clear eyed about facts doesn’t mean I support your perceived opposing interpretation of what those facts mean.
When and if you do this thing, you are projecting a false narrative onto people. In projecting that false narrative, you shut down the legitimate criticism they are bringing forward, which is a kind of gaslighting.
There are two primary fallacies at work here, the red hearing fallacy and the false choice fallacy.
The red hearing fallacy is that instead of addressing the premise of the argument the interlocutor is making, you are projecting onto them a perceived motivation (your perception), identifying that as the issue, and attacking that. Its way of distracting from their premise and making the argument about something it isn’t or didn’t’ start as.
The false dichotomy fallacy is that this is a binary between Trump and Biden, which has nothing to do with the arguers premise. Its not clear to me that the video even mentions Trump (I’ll check it out once I get this response written), which isn’t at all what they were arguing. Its another form of gaslighting, that if you are bringing these criticisms forward, you must support Trump.
The original interlocutor owes you answers to neither of those. I bring this criticism of your rhetoric to your attention because I’ve been seeing the identical sequence of fallacies, in almost the exact same order, being used across lemmy in an attempt to shut down criticism of Biden, to ignore his realistic chances of re-election, and in-general, to gaslight people as if they were Trump supporters because they are bringing forward legitimate criticism of Biden.
Suppose I tell you your house is flooding. Your current response would have two components: “Flooding is far less damaging than fire”, and “You must be a fan of fire if you aren’t telling me how to put stop the flooding”.
Neither of those have anything to do with the original premise of if the house is, in-fact, flooding.
No one owes you a solution to your problems. Them bringing up that you have a problem doesn’t make them a proponent of some other problem.
mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 year ago
I have a better analogy.
My house is flooding.
Someone comes in the house and says OH MY GOD THERE ARE TERMITES ALL OVER THE HOUSE, and demands that any conversation about what we're going to do about the house has to include the termites, and if you try to talk about the flooding then you're crazy and trying to change the subject away from the termites, and even if something else is going on (like furniture floating away), it must be connected to the termites, and also by the way there are termite exterminator companies in this town who have a vested interest in selling termite exterminator solutions, although the person in your house who wants to connect anything and everything to termites treats any attempt to bring this up as some crazy conspiracy theory which is just more indication that you're not taking the termite problem seriously and you must be making things up.
In this case, something totally unrelated to Biden (the antisemitism bill) is getting linked to him in this particular propaganda-adjacent way in this video, and I think that's notable. That's pretty much the beginning and end of it from my end. You can come up with whatever strawman you like, where somehow me saying that means I don't care about the election or trying to silence criticism or defending genocide or whatever. I honestly didn't even read your whole message. But, the point remains that something totally unrelated to Biden is getting linked to him in this video, and to me that's notable. Really that was all I wanted to say about it.