Comment on A look at search engines with their own indexes
ConstableJelly@beehaw.org 4 months ago
Seems fair, in reference to Kagi:
Unrelatedly: I’m concerned about the company’s biases, as it seems happy to use Brave’s commercial API (allowing blatant homophobia in the comments) and allow its results to recommend suicide methods without intervention. I reject the idea that avoiding an option that may seem politically biased is the same as being unbiased if such a decision has real political implications.
Ilandar@aussie.zone 4 months ago
The “blatant homophobia” claim is an overreaction. The closest thing to this is one post by a single user who said “there’s nothing wrong with being against gay marriage…it’s political opinion and everybody has the right to theirs”. That user was basically the only one arguing in support of Eich in the thread and that was the most controversial thing they said. I think to try and frame this as Kagi implicitly supporting homophobia through a lack of moderation is very disingenuous. If you read through thread you can see many attempts to moderate the discussion, including several locks and warnings.
ConstableJelly@beehaw.org 4 months ago
I can’t disagree. But as one facet among others, I also think “concern” is reasonably warranted in conducting a comparative assessment.
Ilandar@aussie.zone 4 months ago
Affiliation with Brave and, therefore, Eich is relevant and deserves to be mentioned in the interest of potential users. I just think the way the author extrapolates their own opinion of that comment into an implication that “Kagi allows blatant homophobia on their forums because of a political bias/their affiliation with Brave” to be really misleading and underhanded.