2200 isn’t “normal.” Both numbers are “normal” at different weights. If you reverse the ratio then you see it’s 0.656% or that it has…
DECREASED BY A THIRD. WHO COULD HAVE PREDICTED THAT…?
Also, you randomly reused the 2200 you spouted earlier instead of running the calculator again for 150 lbs which would be 2,352. So it’s actually even less than that.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
3350/2200 = 1.52 -> 52% more than normal
Just using the numbers you provided
Image
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 years ago
2200 isn’t “normal.” Both numbers are “normal” at different weights. If you reverse the ratio then you see it’s 0.656% or that it has…
DECREASED BY A THIRD. WHO COULD HAVE PREDICTED THAT…?
Also, you randomly reused the 2200 you spouted earlier instead of running the calculator again for 150 lbs which would be 2,352. So it’s actually even less than that.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
Just going by average number based on my local health guidelines.