You’ll be dismissing the vast majority of experts in the fields. The only people who refuse to call it AI are those who think AI refers to the stuff you see in sci-fi movies. The ones doing the work and who actually know what they’re talking about use AI to mean even the simplest thing like a bunch of if statements that make up a hard-coded decisions tree.
Is it possible that I miss out on valuable insights by immediately dismissing the opinions of anyone who refers to machine learning as AI?
Sure.
Will I stop doing it?
Sure as hell not.
howrar@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
aasatru@kbin.earth 5 weeks ago
Artificial intelligence. There's nothing intelligent going on in an LLM model. There's learning, but not intelligence.
The people objecting to the use of the term AI to describe computerized parrots are the people who think intelligence still matters as a concept.
howrar@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
Right, so if that’s the discussion you care about, that’s totally fair. Most researchers I know couldn’t give a rat’s ass what you call it as long as there’s something to call it. I think we’ve all long accepted that no two person will have the same idea of what intelligence means.
AlexanderESmith@kbin.social 5 weeks ago
Indeed. Though that's only my surface level complaint.
On a deeper level; LLMs just fuckin' suck ass. They aren't people, stop assuming they can do things that people can do.
fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I don’t think they suck ass as long as you understand their limitations, but everyone seems to expect them to be able to fully replace human thought and uh, yeah they’re pretty bad if that’s your goal.