Idk about that. Trump only has a problem with this story because the person involved told everyone. If everything was known about any chief-of-state or government candidate in the world, probably you’d find things to use against them in most cases. Even things like this, that are an embarressment rather than any corruption. If a russian asset, rather than Stormy Daniels, had this on Trump, you would not know about it.
Comment on analysis
No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 1 month agoI would argue it is.
As the potential next president it is important to judge if he is incorruptible and if there is anything foreign powers could use to blackmail or bribe him into a specific course of action
cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
alphapuggle@programming.dev 1 month ago
To be fair “potential next president” already answers if someone is corruptable
cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Gotta say, I don’t think Obama was corruptible