but I won’t sign my name to a genocide.
Taking away a vote for “less genocide” is equal to voting for more.
You seem to care more about shortsighted moral grandstanding than actually giving a fuck about the body count.
but I won’t sign my name to a genocide.
Taking away a vote for “less genocide” is equal to voting for more.
You seem to care more about shortsighted moral grandstanding than actually giving a fuck about the body count.
electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
It is a sad day indeed when opposing an active genocide is characterized as “moral grandstanding”.
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Choosing the path that makes more death more likely while claiming to want no death…yeah, that’s moral grandstanding.
I get that it’s a real-life “trolley problem” situation, but it really isn’t that complicated. It sucks that the lever only goes two ways because of FPTP, but you’re not a more moral person for refusing to touch it.
If you actually care about people being killed, then join the movement against the FPTP system so that in the future “no genocide” will be an option, and in the meantime exercise your ability to save lives.
electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
It’s a trolley problem, except we are currently running over thousands of people, and we are still months away from the switch. There’s a guy in power right now, who could stop this, and he needs our votes to win the election. I want more pressure on him before the election, since all leverage is lost afterwards. You want to assure him of our votes, which means he has zero political reason to stop abetting genocide. Don’t you see how by saying “blue no matter who” you are stabbing everyone in the back who is trying to halt this genocide? We know Biden doesn’t mind murdering children, so our only hope is that he actually wants to win the election. In order to leverage that power though, he needs to realize that voters aren’t guaranteed to show up for him.