Comment on sweet dreams
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 months agoPlank length is not like universal pixels. It’s just where current models say there’s little reason to look at smaller things, since it’s kind of like worrying about which flecks of paint are coming off a car in a racing video game. It’s just … so irrelevant as to be ignorable.
It’s nigh impossible to have any energy that could interact with us or atoms on the Plank scale that wouldn’t just collapse in to a black hole. It’s not so much any observation of real-world pixelation, and more that even to atoms, it’s very tiny.
antidote101@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Your comment about current models, known energy types, and universal pixels seems to ignore the post’s topic (which isn’t really about known models or energy types).
A better way to disregard the post would be to just point out that solar systems aren’t that big in terms of scales of the universe, and that there’s no indication of any charges, electrons, or valance layers about.
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I’m not responding to the comic. I’m responding to someone who was talking about the Planck length. Please try to keep up.
antidote101@lemmy.world 4 months ago
No.
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Your loss! 🤷