Comment on What is the Anti Commercial-Al license and why do people keep adding it to their comments?

• my_hat_stinks@programming.dev ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Ironic, considering you are undoubtedly not a lawyer and have evidently never even dealt with copyright issues.

  CC licences are handy copyleft licences to allow others to use your work with minimal effort. Using them to restrict what others can do is a fundamental misunderstanding of how copyright works. If you want to restrict others’ use of your work copyright already handles that, a licence can only be more permissive than default copyright law. You can sign a contract with another party if you want to further restrict their use of their work, but you’ll generally also have to give them something in return for the contract to be valid (known as “consideration”). If you wish to do so you can include a copyright notice (eg “Copyright © 2024 onlinepersona. All rights reserved.”) but that hasn’t been a requirement for a long time.

  source

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Ironic, considering you are undoubtedly not a lawyer and have evidently never even dealt with copyright issues.

    How is it ironic? I never said I was a lawyer, nor did I ever say I was giving legal advice, nor have I ever spoken with authority on the subject.

    You however… can’t see the irony of your own statement.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    source

    • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s ironic because you demand someone be a lawyer to refute an obviously incorrect claim made by a non-lawyer. If you consider me answer the question you asked directly of me “irony” then I suppose I can see how you might consider that comment ironic.

      It’s definitely worth noting that you’ve attempted to shift the topic well away from the absurdity of using an open licence to do the opposite of what licences do and instead onto the topic of who is a lawyer and the definition of irony.

      source

      • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        It’s ironic because you demand someone be a lawyer to refute an obviously incorrect claim made by a non-lawyer.

        When you and others like you make responses of absolute authority and correctiveness on legal matters, then it’s fair to ask if you’re a lawyer.

        Funny enough, every time that question is answered, not once does somebody come back and say “Yes, I’m a lawyer”. Instead they just double down with the same kind of response that you just gave.

        Everyone’s a lawyer until they’re asked to prove their statements on a legal matter that they are advocating for.

        If you replied with IANAL, and just expressed opinion, and not assumed legal fact, then you wouldn’t get that question.

        ~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

        source

        • -> View More Comments