I’m a bit confused by the app and Mailbox app for being able to receive messages while offline separation. The normal app only supports live communication between two online participants?
Comment on FireChat was a tool for revolution. Then it disappeared.
KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 6 months ago
What’s wrong with Briar? briarproject.org
Censorship-resistant peer-to-peer messaging that bypasses centralized servers. Connect via Bluetooth, Wi-Fi or Tor, with privacy built-in.
I think the reason these apps don’t take off is the compromises they make in order to work the way they do. When you do need them, you best hope you’re able to get them and get others to use them as well.
Kissaki@beehaw.org 6 months ago
xnx@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
Android only sadly
flux@beehaw.org 6 months ago
As I understand it, these kind of applications depend on being able to perform activities in the background, which is highly limited in iOS for battery efficiency reasons–and maybe for privacy.
Many years ago I was working on a project that shared connectivity details over wifi/bt, and iOS was troublesome also due to the application not being aware of the local bluetooth address.
Possibly similar issues impact other mesh networking applications on the platform.
Kissaki@beehaw.org 6 months ago
code.briarproject.org/briar/briar/-/wikis/FAQ#wil…
6jarjar6@lemmy.sdf.org 6 months ago
What about Session, the Signal fork?
Cube6392@beehaw.org 6 months ago
Session has made some insecure solution surrounding important design elements like forward secrecy
xnx@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
That is meshnet based
sxan@midwest.social 6 months ago
And? It works on iOS.
I’m missing the point. Was it that systems like Briar can’t work in iOS because they aren’t mesh net? If so, why not choose one that does, like Session?