Comment

Comment on Had to buy a certain product to use a certain substance and there's a really stupid new law.

SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

The vape is classified as a tobacco and cannabis product. So what loophole are they using and how’s it vague?

You realize, I only used it for X is a defense that has failed in court countless times, yeah? Theres always precedence and you want to claim ignorance of this. That doesn’t work dude.

source

Sort:hotnew top

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Where does it say that the vaporizer is classified as something used for tobacco or cannabis in PACT?

source
- SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  All electronic nicotine delivery systems (“ENDS”) and substances that can be used with ENDS are held to the same rules as cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products. All regulations that apply to cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products now also apply to all ENDS, which is defined very broadly as “any electronic device that, through an aerosolized solution, delivers nicotine, flavor or any other substance to the user inhaling from the device.” The breadth of this language puts manufacturers of vape pens for use with liquid cannabis, CBD, or other non-nicotine liquids in the untenable position of having to try to comply with a statute intended to regulate tobacco products.
  
  Did YOU even read your own source……?
  
  source
  - FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    The source is an article talking about the law, not the law itself. The law itself is quoted and does not make it clear that it is also about cannabis, which is the problem.
    
    Laws should be clear and precise. I’m not sure why people think otherwise.
    
    source
    SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    It’s covered by the fucking smoking law that covers both.
    
    I’m sorry you can’t comprehend how laws are intertwined, but you’ve also had a dozen people tell you the exact same thing.
    
    Its not easy to convince you that your show is untied is it?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments