Comment

DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I think that’s where this commenter was leaning, though, with their final comment. Assisted suicide should absolutely be available to those suffering terminal illnesses and the like. But, the rules surrounding it must be very clear and anyone assisting suicide under those rules must be very well educated.

In the absence of assisted suicide rules, or where existing ones don’t apply to a specific case, then human life should be protected as a default setting.

source

Sort:hotnew top

FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Naw. Why should I be bound by your religious views?

It’s either my life and I have the right to end it, or not. If I have the right to end it, I should be allowed to get competent help to do so.

I agree that one should not suicide, but, if I knew that I would be falsely imprisoned just because I mentioned it to my doctor (“for my benefit”) then I can never actually get real, meaningful help away from it.

Further, now, how do you define pain? Physical pain? Emotional pain?

source
- DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Jesus, you couldn’t possibly have misinterpreted my reply more than you just have:
  
  No religious view was expressed - I’ve been a staunch atheist for nearly 40 years, since I was old enough to tell my mum I didn’t believe in any of it.
  
  I never said people shouldn’t suicide - I’m very much a supporter of assisted suicide. I’m saying that, if the rules around assisted suicide don’t apply, then the default action for people sworn to protect human life should be to stop suicides. You know - the point of this entire post.
  
  Who said anything about pain? No need to put words in my mouth.
  
  source