Quiet quit is something else.
But I know what you’re saying. For example twitter needed people to quit without being fired (due to how unemployment works in the US) and so it said no more WFH (without warning).
I suspect a lot of other companies are doing the same thing.
WaLLy3K@infosec.pub 1 year ago
But isn’t ‘quiet quitting’ the act of the employee giving the bare minimum needed to achieve a paycheck? It sounds like you’re talking about getting employees to flat-out quit so the company doesn’t need to pay benefits that come with being fired.
mutch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
The concept of quiet quitting always struck me as bullshit in general. Like if your employees can do that, if they’re able to just sort of log in and barely do anything, then they should. That’s the manager’s fault and responsibility to keep employees engaged or demand more from them. If the minimum amount of work isn’t enough for the manager, then it isn’t really the minimum, right?