Comment on Anon encounters a Switch owner
caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 8 months agoUh
The one that defined the franchise? Isn’t true to the franchise? It literally was the franchise in its time.
It’s the originator. It’s the roots in “get back to our roots”. Talking nonsense about “departures” is pretty dumb when the direction in which it departs is towards the first game in the series. That’s not a departure, that’s a return.
Zelda 1 started the franchise, but it doesn’t define it. Ask anyone the most definitive Zelda game, and most people will tell you Zelda 3: A Link to the Past, or Ocarina of Time.
Notably, every mainline Zelda game after 3 followed a definitive formula, which BotW and TotK ditched. TotK kinda tried to bring back some of the formula, and thats why I say TotK is far better than BotW, but it still wasn’t what most would expect from Zelda.
“Oh no, Zelda’s too much like Zelda”
Zehzin@lemmy.world 8 months ago
So the latest Prince of Persia isn’t a departure from the usual formula because the Apple II PoP was a sidescroller?
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
Yes