Comment on San Francisco bill would let people sue grocery stores for closing too quickly
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 7 months agoMost places in the US have become a shit show. It’s not isolated to San Francisco and the least a multi-billion dollar corporation could do before existing this particular shit show is make sure it doesn’t become an even shittier show as a result of their business practices.
I don’t understand why you think the corporation here is innocent and the city has to deal with the consequences of the corporation’s actions when you clearly don’t trust them to in the first place.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 7 months ago
That isn’t the reason at all. It’s because of the crime.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 7 months ago
They have to pay to ensure there’s a new grocery store because crime? Not because they’ve already killed smaller shops for decades, creating effectively a duopoly (monopoly if their merger with Kroger goes through)?
I’m starting to think “crime” is just a conservative catch-all term for “I want to be justified in this”
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Find another grocery store, created a co-op etc. none of these are their obligations. I suspect this will get thrown out if passed
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 7 months ago
The bill just says they need to give notice.
You have to get notice to be evicted, you typically give notice to quit a job, why is it such a bad idea for a large grocery chain to give notice before closing their store?
I’m struggling to understand why that would enrage you.