Comment on [deleted]
qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago(He was also against gay marriage, but that’s no longer politically relevant.)
I think it very much is politically relevant. Who would such a person appoint to the supreme court, if given the opportunity?
ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Gay marriage was politically relevant then - that’s one reason I didn’t vote for him. But even then gay marriage opponents were losing the fight, and since then they have been thoroughly defeated. By 2020 even Donald Trump was speaking out in favor of gay rights.
Anyway, the point I wanted to make was that a present-day governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney would oppose abortion but not gay marriage.