Comment on [deleted]

• NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  You just want to try and feel superior to others and your "study" involved 82 people.

  That is too small of a sample size to be worth anything, especially since they were dealing with gambling, you know that thing that produces addictive dopamine spikes, and is therefore biased from the beginning.

  source

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    Luckily there’s been a literal decade of further studies backing it up

    Cool, huh?

    source

    • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      So you had more information and decided to link only the small sample size on gamblers one?

      Seems to me you started this looking for a fight and a gotcha moment now, otherwise why use your worst study first and alone?

      Cool, huh?

      source
    • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      So you had more information and decided to link only the small sample size on gamblers one?

      Seems to me you started this looking for a fight and a gotcha moment now, otherwise why use your worst study first and alone?

      Cool, huh?

      source