If a company can’t afford to pay their employees a livable wage, they deserve to go under. Yeah it sucks for the workers but so does staying with a company that can’t pay them. Stop licking boots.
If a company can’t afford to pay their employees a livable wage, they deserve to go under. Yeah it sucks for the workers but so does staying with a company that can’t pay them. Stop licking boots.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 7 months ago
You’re licking boots.
The people were living on their current wage. They were happy with their wage. It’s in the article.
Now they have no job and no wages. Now they are sad.
Their wage was liveable to them. Now it’s not. The market was working fine until the government got in the middle and took away their jobs.
BunkerBuster@lemmy.world 7 months ago
How about this for a new title: “Salty Restaurant owner doesn’t like new law that doesn’t apply to him, fires everyone anyway”
Gotta love the free market, right?
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 7 months ago
The law does apply to him. She’s incorrect.
A better title would be California governor causes mass layoffs.
The owner has no obligation to provide jobs. If the risk isn’t worth the reward, he’ll shut down. That’s how it works.
BunkerBuster@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I believe the article over you.