Comment on The right thing for the wrong reasons: FLOSS doesn't imply security
TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
This serves as a springboard and a fallacy by omission that closed source is just as workable and trustable. I noticed this with r/PrivacyGuides and GrapheneOS Matrix room moderator Tommy_Tran/B0risGrishenko in this bullshit announcement post and comments regarding Rule 1 (no closed source software):
https://teddit.net/r/PrivacyGuides/comments/siqc69/consideration_on_removing_rule_1/