No, that’s a weird conclusion. Since there is nothing to inherit which is what both articles talk about, it shows the inability to transfer wealth which leaves the poor, poor.
No, that’s a weird conclusion. Since there is nothing to inherit which is what both articles talk about, it shows the inability to transfer wealth which leaves the poor, poor.
tswiftchair@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Except that, by their own words, removing social security doesn’t solve that problem.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Actually it does. That’s the point of the articles and they explain why. Cato says the same the same thing.