Comment on [deleted]
t3rmit3@beehaw.org 7 months agoad-free spy-free platforms that give you actual control over what appears in your feed
You won’t know any of those are ad-free or spy-free (which is not true anyways, fediverse instances are absolutely being scraped), or know you could control those if you left Threads. All you’ll know is, "I like this thing I’m seeing in Threads, so to see more of it, I should use Threads more.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 7 months ago
Because Google is so expensive?
Scraping public data is entirely different from collecting your contact history, location history, web browsing traffic, decrypting WhatsApp traffic, etc. etc. and on and on.
t3rmit3@beehaw.org 7 months ago
Fediverse instances can also do this. They know your IP and email, and the stuff you reveal about yourself. You could de-anonymize many users with those plus the info they share about themselves on here, with a bit of OSINT work.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 7 months ago
Do you have reason to believe any of that is happening?
Bruh your Facebook username is literally my first and last name. Same goes for most people on most platforms. I don’t particularly care about anonymity.
I’ve never used a Fediverse app that asked for any of that. They have no use for it.
You don’t seem to understand the myriad of data that Facebook collects unnecessarily and without user consent. Do a search for Facebook Pixels. They were just caught decrypting traffic from SnapChat. Most Fediverse servers are far too small to even bother with collecting and selling that sort of data.
The two are not even remotely comparable.
t3rmit3@beehaw.org 7 months ago
I’m not arguing they’re comparable; I’m the one out of the 2 of us arguing not to have any interaction with Meta apps, including via federation. I’m arguing that you shouldn’t be trying to sell a false sense of anonymity with fediverse instances. You said they’re “spy-free”, not “far less intrusive than Facebook”. The latter is true. The former is not.