Comment on Why is the consumption of Meat considered bad
NeuralNerd@lemmy.world 1 year agoBecause if something is not sentient it cannot have negative experiences, so you can’t be harmed.
Comment on Why is the consumption of Meat considered bad
NeuralNerd@lemmy.world 1 year agoBecause if something is not sentient it cannot have negative experiences, so you can’t be harmed.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
so?
NeuralNerd@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The question was “why is eating meat bad?”, my answer is something like “because to have meat you must harm animals”, and someone answered that “we always harm something when we eat” and my answer is “no, there are foods that you can’t harm because they are not sentient”.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
first, you can’t prove plants aren’t sentient. second even if you could, why should sentience matter? what ethical system even accounts for sentience as a factor of right behavior?
NeuralNerd@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And you can’t prove something is sentient. But scientists have criteria that help determine whether a species is sentient. See this review for example.
I already answered. If something can’t be harmed there no need to prevent harming it.
About all animal welfare:
max@feddit.nl 1 year ago
Even if plants were sentient, and I’m not saying they are, but if. Would you rather “kill” orders of magnitude more plants to feed them to animals, then kill the animals and eat them, or would you kill the plants and eat them directly? One of them causes a lot less harm (if any at all), and it’s not eating the animals.