Comment

No it doesn’t. How does it prove Deckard is a replicant versus proving Tyrell Corps had become just that good at replicating life. In both Blade Runner movies to prove something was replicant they had to get electron microscope close to find printing on cells. Perhaps Rachael was just that human. Unless it was explained somewhere I missed.

source

Sort:hotnew top

AdmiralShat@programming.dev ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
[deleted]
source
- Decoy321@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  Firstly, you come off as a huge dick, btw.
  
  Please refrain from such language in the future. Everyone. Let’s keep it civil, please.
  
  source
- lowleveldata@programming.dev ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Why can’t they make a robot that can have human babies? Sounds possible in the realm of SF
  
  source
  - AdmiralShat@programming.dev ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    [deleted]
    source
    lowleveldata@programming.dev ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    She doesn’t have to have human DNA in other body parts tho. It doesn’t make you human if you only store just DNA in a device for reproductive purposes.
    
    source
- zaphod@feddit.de ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Nobody claimed they’re genetically manipulated humans. They’re organic but man-made, and apparently it’s very hard to tell the difference to a real human except through emotional responses.
  
  source