Comment on Someone gets killed by a car, so they restrict e-bikes.

ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Son_of_dad@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m from Toronto, same. Also as a pedestrian, those ebikers scare me the way cars scare them. They’re not allowed on the sidewalk in my city, but you’ll be walking with your toddler and an ebike speeds past you on the sidewalk almost hitting you. And they’ll switch between sidewalk and road depending on the traffic, so I have no love for ebikers.

  source

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Blame the city not the biker. An person riding an bike will always choose a protected bike lane over having to weave through pedestrians on the sidewalk. If you want to get mad at someone get mad at the city for not putting down a bike lane instead of the biker just trying to not get hit. Pedestrians and cyclist need to have solidarity to take back the road from there dominance by cars. Fighting between each other over the scraps they give us only helps them, we need to demand more.

    source

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      No. The city didn’t zip past me and my kids, it was the biker. My city is filled with unused bike lanes as the bikes zip around the sidewalk

      source

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Was there a protected bike lane next to you when they zipped passed you? It doesn’t matter if there’s a bunch of unused bike lanes in the city if they aren’t where you need to go. There are tons of sidewalks and car lanes that sit unused most of the time but we keep them open because people will eventually use them.

        If we treated bikes like we treat cars and pedestrians and give them they’re own lane on every street none of this would happen, cause bikes don’t want to ride on sidewalks just as much as pedestrians don’t want them on the sidewalks. Weaving through pedestrians slows you down and is dangerous. You may be just as scared of bikes as the bikes are of cars but the cars aren’t nearly as afraid of bikes as bikes are of pedestrians. If your in a car and you hit a bike your going to be fine physically cause your surrounded by a metal box meant to protect you. If your on a bike and hit a pedestrian , you may come out better than the pedestrian, but you are way more likely to be physically injured or dead then if you were a driver. There’s a shared stake in avoiding collisions between pedestrians and cyclist that cars don’t have.

        The solution has to be more bike lanes and not less e-bikes because e-bikes are better for the environment and people’s health than cars. Even looking at it as just a pedestrian your better with an e-bike riding in a lane next to you then a car, there less dangerous, quieter, and don’t emit a bunch of toxic fumes and brake pad dust that you have to breathe in. The cars are the enemy, not the e-bikes.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • guacupado@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    And they’ll switch between sidewalk and road depending on the traffic, so I have no love for ebikers.

    This is the problem I have with bikes. They want the pros of pedestrians and vehicles without the cons of either.

    source

    • Gabu@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      There shouldn’t be a con at all. The only “con” is the fact you were conned into believing cars belong in a city.

      source