Comment on [deleted]
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 9 months agoThat wouldn’t be an h1 anymore. That would be a standard visa.
We don’t need h1b when we have other visas that serve the person
Comment on [deleted]
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 9 months agoThat wouldn’t be an h1 anymore. That would be a standard visa.
We don’t need h1b when we have other visas that serve the person
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 9 months ago
H1b is a visa, they have different applications.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Yes the current application is to abuse workers. There is no need for an h1b. Other visas can be used instead.
We need a simpler process. Not 50 types of visas to screw as many people as possible.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 9 months ago
H1bs are more attainable because they can be petitioned by any company without a strict education requirement, can be extended, does not discriminate on position or require work history with the employer.
In many circumstances, h1b is the simpler process.
I agree a simplification would be beneficial, so why are congressional Republicans making immigration reform legislation and then voting it down?
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 9 months ago
H1b has a very strict education requirement. It’s the cornerstone of the program. It does discriminate on position. It is a cornerstone of the position.
H1b are used to under pay workers who are brought in to compete against American jobs.
washingtonpost.com/…/15424446-5c9a-11ee-b961-94e1…
This is a program both sides except you hate.