Comment on Americans split on who they trust to do a better job as president: POLL

• wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That is no the conclusion the jury came to in their verdict.

  I am defending logic and facts. It was a civil trial. It can’t determine guilt, only liability.

  source

  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Keep justifying his actions to yourself to not feel like a trash bag for supporting him:

    “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

    source

    • wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Which clearly is saying he didn’t criminally rape her. I mean how silly is that? A court saying since it didn’t meet the legal standard, we are going to say it anyways. lol

      Clown world.

      source

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        We’re going in circles. In other words you’re completely fine supporting a Presidential Candidate who commits rape, as long as the state they do it in makes it hard to legally call it rape.

        You can’t argue he didn’t do it either, because he was already found to have committed the act itself, so at best you’re supporting a guy who openly sexually assaults women and you’re ok with it because New York doesn’t call it rape.

        source

        • -> View More Comments