Comment

Comment on Americans split on who they trust to do a better job as president: POLL

Fal@yiffit.net ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

No, OJ is not a murderer. He was acquitted of a crime.

So the civil jury that found him guilty committed libel? If someone is found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, you think that means people in casual conversation couldn’t call them a murderer?

If you want to call biden a rapist because you think Tara Reade’s account is credible, that’s fine. Go for it. But people are allowed to look at the facts as they see them and make judgments. And just because a jury doesn’t convict someone that doesn’t mean they didn’t commit the crime

source

Sort:hotnew top

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

So the civil jury that found him guilty committed libel? If someone is found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, you think that means people in casual conversation couldn’t call them a murderer?

I don’t know any educated people who would. He was not convicted of murder, and legal libel is a low standard to meet.

There is zero evidence that Trump committed rape on Jean. She doesn’t know the most basic facts. I get you dislike Trump, but banana courts are just damaging to the whole country.

source
- Fal@yiffit.net ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  I don’t know any educated people who would.
  
  Hahaha. You don’t know ANYone “educated” that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure.
  
  I get you dislike Trump, but banana courts are just damaging to the whole country.
  
  No one’s talking about a court, we’re talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse
  
  source
  - wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    Hahaha. You don’t know ANYone “educated” that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure. What lower crime was he convicted of? I am not aware that OJ has been convicted of any crime.
    
    No one’s talking about a court, we’re talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse Trump is legally libel for sexual abuse. The jury agreed with the lack of evidence and still came to the conclusion it happened. I don’t deny that at all.
    
    source
    Fal@yiffit.net ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    The jury agreed with the lack of evidence and still came to the conclusion it happened. I don’t deny that at all.
    
    What does this even mean? The jury found him liable for sexual abuse. What crazy mental gymnastics are you doing to suggest that they “agreed with the lack of evidence”?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments