Comment on Expertise

<- View Parent
spujb@lemmy.cafe ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

i think you bring up valid instances where this is fair.

but i think i’m speaking to the very obvious and important ones that are worthy of reproduction. like i’ve seen articles be like “these corporations are responsible for 99% of climate change” or something

and the comments will be like “duh we knew that”

which true, but not empirically. being able to cite data from actual research from professionals is so invaluable and far better than anecdotes or guesses.

that said, is there some way for a layperson like me to identify when research is not deemed worthy of reproduction? or is it a lost cause

source
Sort:hotnewtop