Comment on I propose a rule change
masterofballs@wolfballs.com 2 years agoI mean news worthy or historical photos should be allowed but at the end of the day that is a fussy line and a admin or mod will have to make a gut decision on it.
I just wouldn't want actual necrophiliacs to take over the site. There is a dark part of the internet that is into that kinda stuff I don't want to be anywhere near.
Spotted_Lady@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
I get you on that.
And what about cartoon nudity? Still NSFW, right? That said, Wikipedia uses such images to depict the topics. Like if you look up fellatio. That has a cartoon image depicting it. They've mulled over ways to detect IPs in certain places and hide the images by default for them.
Esperantist@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
If we just go strictly by the initialism, drawn sexual images even if not pornographic don't seem like the kind of thing that'd be safe to look at at work. Seems fitting to give them an NSFW tag.
goldenballs@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Wilipedia pages of sexual related things are the borderline of that and medical diagrams. The question should always be "Why are you looking at that at work?" That test applies to textual content as well images and some sounds or music.