Comment on I propose a rule change
masterofballs@wolfballs.com 2 years agoYeah I mean like dead people photos, videos of people being eaten, people having sex with dead people that kinda stuff.
I didn't even think of necrophilia and cannibalism.
I don't see what would be wrong with non-disturbing photos of the dead. For instance, in the old days, photography was so expensive that oftentimes, the only photos that folks had of them were when they were dead. We consider that creepy today, but they'd dress them up, pose with them, etc., since they'd never have that opportunity again.
I mean news worthy or historical photos should be allowed but at the end of the day that is a fussy line and a admin or mod will have to make a gut decision on it.
I just wouldn't want actual necrophiliacs to take over the site. There is a dark part of the internet that is into that kinda stuff I don't want to be anywhere near.
I get you on that.
And what about cartoon nudity? Still NSFW, right? That said, Wikipedia uses such images to depict the topics. Like if you look up fellatio. That has a cartoon image depicting it. They've mulled over ways to detect IPs in certain places and hide the images by default for them.
If we just go strictly by the initialism, drawn sexual images even if not pornographic don't seem like the kind of thing that'd be safe to look at at work. Seems fitting to give them an NSFW tag.
How do you define "non-disturbing"? There are some pretty challenging red sites on the dark web. You can watch videos of pretty serious crimes. Surely the point is context and relevance...
I mean what is "wolfballs" for? What is the manifesto?
You knew what I meant. It is much like the Supreme Court justice who said, "I can't tell you what pornography is, but I know it when I see it."
So a non-disturbing photo of a dead person would be like someone who just peacefully died, like photos from a funeral service. Disturbing would be things like blood, brains, and protruding bones.
Not all the same things are disturbing to everyone, it depends what you're used to. Whatever your supreme court says, art or lingerie catalogues can be used as porn
goldenballs@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Have you got a list, or are you still indexing your hard drive?
(Do we need a tag for jokes, to protect the sensitive?)