Comment on Shrodinger’s Megamind
Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 year agoThe set of natural numbers is infinite. The number 2.5 is missing from that set. Therefore infinite sets do not contain every possibility.
It’s not rocket science
Comment on Shrodinger’s Megamind
Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 year agoThe set of natural numbers is infinite. The number 2.5 is missing from that set. Therefore infinite sets do not contain every possibility.
It’s not rocket science
TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You’re talking about countable infinities vs uncountable infinities, but you’re proving my point. Order is a countable infinity, disorder is an uncountable infinity. You’ve just abstracted yourself into a corner.
Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 year ago
sigh, very well then.
Consider the set of real numbers, which is an uncountable infinity. Notice how this infinite set does not contain any grapes.
It’s not rocket science
TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Grapes and real numbers are both finite distinctions of a shared infinitely ordered set, which itself is part of an infinitely disordered set. Numbers are an infinitely ordered set that do not contain grapes. Grapes are part of many finite sets that are also part of an infinitely ordered set. Both exist within disordered and ordered sets as well. You’re not describing limitations of the infinite like you think you are. You’re only describing the limitations of your understanding of the infinite.
CaptainEffort@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Exactly this. I think the real problem is that infinite is virtually impossible to comprehend, so people regularly misunderstand what it means and how it works.
Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Well, yes, obviously different infinite sets have different contents. Do you have a point that’s actually relevant to what we’re talking about?