Comment

Comment on Why are so many countries in the world “developing” and poor, while essentially only Western countries have a high standard of living?

<- View Parent

agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Nothing I said conflicts with any of that? Han, Mongol, Turkic, Persian, and many other “ethnicities” across the continent play out just fine when taking light skin tone into consideration. Again, explicitly not race. I am talking about “white” as a skin tone, potentially correlated with harsher comes.

source

Sort:hotnew top

XiELEd@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Also you’re too focused on trying to defend yourself from any potential accusation? What about that point someone made that in some points of history, regions of relatively high cultural development change over time?

source
- agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  All I’m saying is that regions with harsher winters experienced early consistent pressures to develop specific technologies: agriculture, food storage, preservation, textiles, and weatherproof shelters. Early development of those technologies helped push them toward industrialization earlier. Not that they’re the only regions that were ever developed, especially after the establishment of wider trade routes. I don’t understand the enthusiasm of everyone to turn this into a race thing.
  
  source
XiELEd@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I mean, not many people would call Eastern Asians “white people”

source
- agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Okay. I am, in the context of skin tone, witch is the only thing relevant to my point. I don’t subscribe to racist ideology. “White” isn’t even a coherent race.
  
  source