restless@hexbear.net 18 hours ago
Helen said she feels the incident in Tesco may have stemmed from the debate in recent years over transgender rights. She said: "I suspect it’s stemming from this which is a shame but I think potentially why people are being more cautious.
"I can understand the cautiousness from a business point of view but they’ve also got to be aware of diversity and people being different. They should not make assumptions on visible differences.
“I just think that we need to raise awareness of the condition and that people do look different. If you’re concerned about something ask privately or sensitively.”
So she’s not against the public harassment of people using toilets per se, just doesn’t want them directed against people with her condition specifically? Girl, visible differences are almost entirely what this boils down to in practice—people being uncomfortable when they see someone who doesn’t look “normal”. Justifying the underlying motive but not the outcome just means you want a carve-out
Tweak@feddit.uk 15 hours ago
I don’t see where she gave any such negative opinion? Closest was she said she understood from a business point of view, as in, a business needs to follow the law.
restless@hexbear.net 14 hours ago
Least surprising instance to be getting pushback from lmao
We’re talking about transphobic nonsense laws that should be rightfully ignored and challenged in court
Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 14 hours ago
The concern isn’t about people being targeted, it’s about the wrong people being targeted.